Just wondering what the process is for suggesting new content for the next release of the LOINC-SNOMED extension.
I’ve done some analysis against the October 2025 version of RCPA SPIA reporting subset of LOINC, by Pathology discipline.
Pathology Discipline
Mapped
Unmapped
Chemical Pathology
642
45
Haematology / Transfusion Medicine
119
69
Immunopathology
203
135
Microbial Serology and PCR
501
81
There is good coverage of Chemical Pathology and Microbial serology/NAA.
Transfusion medicine and Immunology had significant gaps.
I am happy to share my results, which include the LOINC codes without a map to SNOMED CT Observables if that helps inform the next tranche of codes.
Hello Michael, we will route this feedback to the appropriate group. In the future, or if you’d like to expand upon this, you can submit feedback on the collaboration website at Feedback – LOINC / SNOMED CT .
That feedback form does not allow for attachments. My feedback would consist of:
Here are the gaps I found when comparing RCPA SPIA value sets to the LOINC-SNOMED ontology, and upload the map spreadsheets.